Bao, L., Calice, M. N., Brossard, D., Beets, B., Scheufele, D. A., & Rose, K. M. (2023). Public Understanding of Science. DOI: 10.1177/0963662522109441
Surveying public perceptions of artificial intelligence in health care in the United States: Systematic review.
Beets, B., Newman, T. P., Howell, E. L., Bao, L., & Yang, S. (2023). Journal of Medical Internet Research. DOI: 10.2196/40337
When national identity meets conspiracies: the contagion of national identity language in public engagement and discourse about COVID-19 conspiracy theories.
Chen, A., Chen, K., Zhang, J., Meng, J., & Shen, C. (2023). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. DOI: 10.1093/jcmc/zmac034
Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2023). Environmental Communication. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1910530
Krause, N. M., Beets, B., Howell, E. L., Tosteson, H., & Scheufele, D. A. (2023). Vaccine. DOI: 10.1016%2Fj.vaccine.2022.12.045
Li, N., Villanueva, I. I., Jilk, T., Van Matre, B. R., & Brossard, D. (2023). Artistic representations of data can help bridge the US political divide over climate change. Communications Earth & Environment. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00856-9 …
Bao, L., Krause, N. M., Calice, M. N., Scheufele, D. A., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., Newman, T. P., & Xenos, M. A. (2022). Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107182
Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2022). Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.abo0668
Public communication of soil conservation practices: A large-scale content analysis of Wisconsin’s agricultural trade publications.
Chen. K., & Shaw, B. (2022). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00167
Can’t you all just get along? Effects of scientific disagreement and incivility on attention to and trust in science.
Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2022). Science Communication. DOI: 10.1177/10755470211054446
The “infodemic” infodemic: Towards a more nuanced understanding of truth-claims and the need for (not) combatting misinformation.
Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., & Scheufele, D. A. (2022). The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. DOI: 10.1177/00027162221086263
Li, N., Molder, A. L., & Yang, S. (2022). Health Science Reports. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.496
Newman, T. P. (2022). Molecular Biology and Clinical Medicine in the Age of Politicization. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.12.001
Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 1-8. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385
Chen, K., Bao, L., Shao, A., Ho, P., Yang, S., Wirz, C., Brossard, D., Brauer, M., & Brown, L. (2020)
How public perceptions of social distancing evolved over a critical time period: Communication lessons learnt from the American state of Wisconsin. Journal of Science Communication. DOI: 10.22323/2.19050211
Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication. DOI: 10.1177/1075547020950735
Consumers’ evaluation of animal welfare labels on poultry products. Journal of Applied Communications. DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.2310
The Emergence of Science as a Political Brand. Journal of Political Marketing. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2019.1652225
Public attitudes toward urban foxes and coyotes: the roles of perceived risks and benefits, political ideology, ecological worldview, and attention to local news about urban wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2020.1748768
Mobilizing mini-publics: The causal impact of deliberation on civic engagement using panel data. Politics. DOI: 10.1177/0263395720902982.
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805874115.
Which communication channels shape normative perceptions about buying local food? An application of social exposure. Agriculture and Human Values. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-019-09926-1
Open Governance: A New Paradigm for Understanding Urban Governance in an Information Age. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2019.00003
Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science. DOI: 10.1177/0963662518801170
Howell, E. L., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., Jamieson, K. H., Scheufele, D. A., Winneg, K. M., & Xenos, M. A. (2018)
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on genetically engineered crops influences public discourse. Politics and the Life Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2018.12
Protective Progressives to Distrustful Traditionalists: A Post Hoc Segmentation Method for Science Communication Environmental Communication. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
Lifestyle segmentation and political ideology: Toward understanding beliefs and behavior about local food. Appetite, 132, 1, 106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.003
Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156-168. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
U.S. attitudes on human genome editing. Science, 357(6351), 553-554. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3708
The polls—Trends: Attitudes about food and food-related biotechnology. Public Opinion Quarterly. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfw038
Using De-extinction to Create Extinct Species Proxies; Natural History not Included.Ethics, Policy & Environment, 1-3. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2017.1291832
YouTube, social norms and perceived salience of climate change in the American mind. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047887
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400-414. DOI: 10.1177/0963662516629749