Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805874115.
Which communication channels shape normative perceptions about buying local food? An application of social exposure. Agriculture and Human Values. doi: 10.1007/s10460-019-09926-1
Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, doi: 10.1177/0963662518801170
Howell, E. L., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., Jamieson, K. H., Scheufele, D. A., Winneg, K. M., & Xenos, M. A. (2018)
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on genetically engineered crops influences public discourse. Politics and the Life Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2018.12
Protective Progressives to Distrustful Traditionalists: A Post Hoc Segmentation Method for Science Communication Environmental Communication. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
Lifestyle segmentation and political ideology: Toward understanding beliefs and behavior about local food. Appetite, 132, 1, 106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.003
Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156-168. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
U.S. attitudes on human genome editing. Science, 357(6351), 553-554. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3708
The polls—Trends: Attitudes about food and food-related biotechnology. Public Opinion Quarterly. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfw038
Using De-extinction to Create Extinct Species Proxies; Natural History not Included.Ethics, Policy & Environment, 1-3. doi:10.1080/21550085.2017.1291832
YouTube, social norms and perceived salience of climate change in the American mind. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047887
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science Communication? Public Understanding of Science , 25(4), 400-414. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749