Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science. DOI: 10.1177/0963662518801170
Select Publications
Howell, E. L., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., Jamieson, K. H., Scheufele, D. A., Winneg, K. M., & Xenos, M. A. (2018)
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on genetically engineered crops influences public discourse. Politics and the Life Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2018.12
Runge, K.K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M.A. (2018)
Protective Progressives to Distrustful Traditionalists: A Post Hoc Segmentation Method for Science Communication Environmental Communication. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
Witzling, L., Shaw, B. (2018)
Lifestyle segmentation and political ideology: Toward understanding beliefs and behavior about local food. Appetite, 132, 1, 106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.003
Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2018)
Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156-168. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Howell, E. L., Rose, K. M., Brossard, D., & Hardy, B. W. (2017)
U.S. attitudes on human genome editing. Science, 357(6351), 553-554. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3708
Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Rose, K. M., & Larson, B. J. (2017)
The polls—Trends: Attitudes about food and food-related biotechnology. Public Opinion Quarterly. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfw038
Kohl, P. (2017)
Using De-extinction to Create Extinct Species Proxies; Natural History not Included.Ethics, Policy & Environment, 1-3. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2017.1291832
Spartz, J.T., Su, L., Griffin, R, Brossard, D. & Dunwoody, S. (2017)
YouTube, social norms and perceived salience of climate change in the American mind. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047887
Simis, M.J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M.A., Yeo, S.K. (2016)
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400-414. DOI: 10.1177/0963662516629749