Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805874115.
Which communication channels shape normative perceptions about buying local food? An application of social exposure. Agriculture and Human Values. doi: 10.1007/s10460-019-09926-1
Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, doi: 10.1177/0963662518801170
The potential role of Actively Open-Minded Thinking in preventing motivated reasoning about controversial science. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.001
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on genetically engineered crops influences public discourse. Politics and the Life Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2018.12
Protective Progressives to Distrustful Traditionalists: A Post Hoc Segmentation Method for Science Communication Environmental Communication. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
Lifestyle segmentation and political ideology: Toward understanding beliefs and behavior about local food. Appetite, 132, 1, 106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.003
Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156-168. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw022
Spreading Success Beyond the Laboratory: Applying the RE-AIM Framework for Effective Environmental Communication Interventions at Scale. Environmental Communication, 1-135. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289110